Canon’s newly-announced EOS R10 and EOS R7 are both aps-c digital cameras and part of the mirrorless R System. Although they share several similarities in features, they are aimed at separate audiences and also have plenty of important differences. This informative article compares the two cameras, including their construction and detailed specifications.
Cannon EOS R10 vs EOS R7 Size and Switch Layout
The EOS R10 is a midrange camera that’s more consumer-oriented, whereas the EOS R7 is a more advanced camera with a heftier build quality. Neither camera is particularly large, but the EOS R10 is the more transportable of the two. The following pictures are to scale.
Together with the differences in size, the EOS R7 also has a more advanced control layout. Take note the additional dial on the back and the dedicated ISO key on the top of the EOS R7. These features will be appreciated by advanced photographers who would like quick manual controls. Nevertheless, the EOS R10’s design is still reasonably advanced, including a dedicated AF-On button plus joystick that are usually found only on higher-end cameras.
Canon EOS R10 vs EOS R7 Specifications
Below is a detailed comparison of the features offered by the Canon EOS R10 and Cannon EOS R7:
|Digital camera Feature||Canon EOS R10||Canon EOS R7|
|Sensor Resolution||24. 2 MP||32. 5 MP|
|In-Body Image Stablizing||No||Yes, 5-Axis|
|Sensor Size||twenty two. 3 × 14. 9 mm (APS-C)||22. 3 × 14. 8 mm (APS-C)|
|Picture Size||6000 × 4000||6960 × 4640|
|Pixel Size||three or more. 72 µm||3. 20 µm|
|Image-processor||DIGIC X||DIGIC X|
|Viewfinder||Digital / EVF||Electronic / EVF|
|Viewfinder Type / Resolution||OLED / 2 . 36 Million Dots||OLED / several. 69 Million Dots|
|Viewfinder Coverage||100 %||100%|
|Viewfinder Magnification||0. 95×||1 ) 15×|
|Flash Sync Quickness, Mechanical||1/200||1/250|
|Flash Sync Speed, Electronic||1/250||1/320|
|Storage Media||1× SD, UHS-II Compatible||two times SD, UHS-II Compatible|
|Optimum FPS, Mechanical||15 FPS||15 FPS|
|Maximum FPS, Electronic||23 FPS||30 FPS|
|Buffer Capacity (Lossless Compressed RAW)||21 frames (23 FPS), 29 Frames (15 FPS)||42 structures (30 FPS), 51 Structures (15 FPS)|
|Buffer Capacity (Lossy Compressed C-RAW)||43 frames (23 FPS), 157 Frames (15 FPS)||93 Frames (30 FPS), 187 Frames (15 FPS)|
|Utmost Shutter Speed||1/4000 (Mechanical and Electronic)||1/8000 (Mechanical), 1/16, 000 (Electronic)|
|Electronic Front-Curtain Shutter||Yes||Indeed|
|Exposure Metering Sensor||384-Zone Metering||384-Zone Metering|
|Base ISO||INTERNATIONALE ORGANISATION FÜR STANDARDISIERUNG 100||ISO 100|
|Expanded Low INTERNATIONALE ORGANISATION FÜR STANDARDISIERUNG||None||None|
|Highest Local ISO||ISO 32, 000||ISO 32, 000|
|Extended High ISO||ISO 51, 200||ISO 51, 200|
|Autofocus System||Dual Pixel Phase Identify AF||Dual Pixel Phase Detect AF|
|Low-Light AF Sensitivity (f/2 Standardized)||-2. 5 to 21. 5 EV||-3. 5 to 21. 5 EV|
|Internal Video Modes||H. 264 4: 2: 0 8-Bit, or H. 265 four: 2: 2 10-Bit||H. 264 4: 2: 0 8-Bit, or even H. 265 4: two: 2 10-Bit|
|Canon C-Log Video Recording||No||Yes|
|Video Maximum Resolution||4K UHD @ up to 60p||4K UHD @ as much as 60p|
|Mandatory Video Plants||Yes, one 6× Mandatory Crop on 4K 60p||No|
|LCD Size||3. 0″ Diagonal FLAT SCREEN||3. 0″ Diagonal LCD|
|LCD Quality||1, 040, 000 dots||1, 620, 000 dots|
|Bluetooth||Yes, four. 2||Indeed, 4. 2|
|Battery||Canon LP-E17||Canon LP-E6NH/LP-E6N/LP-E6|
|Battery Life (CIPA)||430 Shots (LCD), 260 Shots (EVF)||770 Shots (LCD), 500 Pictures (EVF)|
|Weather Sealed Entire body||No||Yes|
|USB Version||Type-C second . 0||Type-C 3. 2 Gen two|
|Weight (Including Battery and Card)||429 g (0. 95 lbs)||612 g (1. 35 lbs)|
|Measurements (W×H×D)||123 × 88 × 83 mm (4. 8 × 3. 5 × 3. 3 in. )||132 × ninety × 92 mm (5. 2 × 3. six × 3. 6 inside. )|
|MSRP, Body Just||$979 ( Pre-Order/Check Price )||$1, 499 ( Pre-Order/Check Price )|
Summary and Recommendations
As expected, the EOS R7 has more wins in its column than the EOS R10. The most important benefits of the R7 are the higher-res sensor, dual card slots, bigger barrier, and in-body image stablizing. A headline difference between two cameras is twenty three FPS shooting on the EOS R10 compared to 30 FPS shooting on the EOS R7, although personally, I think 23 FPS is already enough meant for 99. 9% of programs. Remember that 24 FPS is already considered video .
Other differences here and there may be relevant to the particular types of photography that you do. The particular EOS R7 has better battery life, while the EOS R10 is smaller and more lightweight, as the construction comparison showed. The weather sealing and movie features on the EOS R7 are also a bit more advanced than on the EOS R10.
Of course , the EOS R10 is lower in price by $520. That’s a lot of money to save, or to spend on other gear like a better lens or sturdier tripod. I’ll put it this way: a 24 -megapixel camera with a good lens and a steady platform will give you sharper pictures than a 33 megapixel camera with no them, every time.
Which one of these cameras would certainly I recommend? The choice is actually pretty easy. If you’re planning to utilize this camera for advanced or even pro-level sports and creatures photography, I would pick the EOS R7. The higher resolution allows you to put more pixels on a distant subject, while the larger buffer lets you take longer bursts of images before the camera slows down. Other features like dual card slots plus better weather sealing may also be nice to have.
Meanwhile, if you don’t plan to photo those subjects very often – or even if you do, but you’re on a budget and want to put more money toward lenses – go with the EOS R10. It is still extremely capable designed for sports and wildlife, thanks to the high frame rate and essentially the same autofocus system as the EOS R7. The particular R10’s 24 megapixel quality also isn’t too much less than 33 MP anyway, thus landscape and other photographers do not need to worry.
I really hope that helps you choose between the Cannon EOS R10 and EOS R7. Both cameras should be very capable in the right hands, and neither the first is a bad choice even though they’re geared toward different photographers. Let me know below if you have any questions about how the two cameras measure up.