Canon EOS R10 vs Cannon EOS R7

Canon’s newly-announced EOS R10 and EOS R7 are both aps-c digital cameras and part of the mirrorless R System. Although they share several similarities in features, they are aimed at separate audiences and also have plenty of important differences. This informative article compares the two cameras, including their construction and detailed specifications.

Cannon EOS R10 vs EOS R7 Size and Switch Layout

The EOS R10 is a midrange camera that’s more consumer-oriented, whereas the EOS R7 is a more advanced camera with a heftier build quality. Neither camera is particularly large, but the EOS R10 is the more transportable of the two. The following pictures are to scale.

Front view:

Canon EOS R10 vs EOS R7 Size and Front View Comparison

Top view:

Canon EOS R10 vs EOS R7 Size and Top View with Buttons and Control Layout

Back view:

Canon EOS R10 vs EOS R7 Size and Rear View with Buttons and Controls

Together with the differences in size, the EOS R7 also has a more advanced control layout. Take note the additional dial on the back and the dedicated ISO key on the top of the EOS R7. These features will be appreciated by advanced photographers who would like quick manual controls. Nevertheless, the EOS R10’s design is still reasonably advanced, including a dedicated AF-On button plus joystick that are usually found only on higher-end cameras.

Canon EOS R10 vs EOS R7 Specifications

Below is a detailed comparison of the features offered by the Canon EOS R10 and Cannon EOS R7:

Digital camera Feature Canon EOS R10 Canon EOS R7
Sensor Resolution 24. 2 MP 32. 5 MP
Low-Pass Filter Yes Yes
Sensor Type CMOS CMOS
In-Body Image Stablizing No Yes, 5-Axis
Sensor Size twenty two. 3 × 14. 9 mm  (APS-C) 22. 3 × 14. 8 mm  (APS-C)
Picture Size 6000 × 4000 6960 × 4640
Pixel Size three or more. 72 µm 3. 20 µm
Image-processor DIGIC X DIGIC X
Viewfinder Digital / EVF Electronic / EVF
Viewfinder Type / Resolution OLED / 2 . 36 Million Dots OLED / several. 69 Million Dots
Viewfinder Coverage 100 % 100%
Viewfinder Magnification 0. 95× 1 ) 15×
Built-in Flash Yes No
Flash Sync Quickness, Mechanical 1/200 1/250
Flash Sync Speed, Electronic 1/250 1/320
Storage Media 1× SD, UHS-II Compatible two times SD, UHS-II Compatible
Optimum FPS, Mechanical 15 FPS 15 FPS
Maximum FPS, Electronic 23 FPS 30 FPS
Buffer Capacity (Lossless Compressed RAW) 21 frames (23 FPS), 29 Frames (15 FPS) 42 structures (30 FPS), 51 Structures (15 FPS)
Buffer Capacity (Lossy Compressed C-RAW) 43 frames (23 FPS), 157 Frames (15 FPS) 93 Frames (30 FPS), 187 Frames (15 FPS)
Utmost Shutter Speed 1/4000 (Mechanical and Electronic) 1/8000 (Mechanical), 1/16, 000 (Electronic)
Electronic Front-Curtain Shutter Yes Indeed
Exposure Metering Sensor 384-Zone Metering 384-Zone Metering
Base ISO INTERNATIONALE ORGANISATION FÜR STANDARDISIERUNG 100 ISO 100
Expanded Low INTERNATIONALE ORGANISATION FÜR STANDARDISIERUNG None None
Highest Local ISO ISO 32, 000 ISO 32, 000
Extended High ISO ISO 51, 200 ISO 51, 200
Autofocus System Dual Pixel Phase Identify AF Dual Pixel Phase Detect AF
Focus Points 651 651
Low-Light AF Sensitivity (f/2 Standardized) -2. 5 to 21. 5 EV -3. 5 to 21. 5 EV
Internal Video Modes H. 264 4: 2: 0 8-Bit, or H. 265 four: 2: 2 10-Bit H. 264 4: 2: 0 8-Bit, or even H. 265 4: two: 2 10-Bit
Canon C-Log Video Recording No Yes
Video Maximum Resolution 4K UHD @ up to 60p 4K UHD @ as much as 60p
Mandatory Video Plants Yes, one 6× Mandatory Crop on 4K 60p No
Headphone Socket No Yes
Articulating LCD Yes Yes
Touchscreen Yes Yes
LCD Size 3. 0″ Diagonal FLAT SCREEN 3. 0″ Diagonal LCD
LCD Quality 1, 040, 000 dots 1, 620, 000 dots
Built-in GPS No Zero
Wi-Fi Indeed Yes
Bluetooth Yes, four. 2 Indeed, 4. 2
Battery Canon LP-E17 Canon LP-E6NH/LP-E6N/LP-E6
Battery Life (CIPA) 430 Shots (LCD), 260 Shots (EVF) 770 Shots (LCD), 500 Pictures (EVF)
Weather Sealed Entire body No Yes
USB Version Type-C second . 0 Type-C 3. 2 Gen two
Weight (Including Battery and Card) 429 g (0. 95 lbs) 612 g (1. 35 lbs)
Measurements (W×H×D) 123 × 88 × 83 mm (4. 8 × 3. 5 × 3. 3 in. ) 132 × ninety × 92 mm (5. 2 × 3. six × 3. 6 inside. )
MSRP, Body Just $979 ( Pre-Order/Check Price ) $1, 499 ( Pre-Order/Check Price )

Summary and Recommendations

As expected, the EOS R7 has more wins in its column than the EOS R10. The most important benefits of the R7 are the higher-res sensor, dual card slots, bigger barrier, and in-body image stablizing. A headline difference between two cameras is twenty three FPS shooting on the EOS R10 compared to 30 FPS shooting on the EOS R7, although personally, I think 23 FPS is already enough meant for 99. 9% of programs. Remember that 24 FPS is already considered  video .

Other differences here and there may be relevant to the particular types of photography that you do. The particular EOS R7 has better battery life, while the EOS R10 is smaller and more lightweight, as the construction comparison showed. The weather sealing and movie features on the EOS R7 are also a bit more advanced than on the EOS R10.

Of course , the EOS R10 is lower in price by $520. That’s a lot of money to save, or to spend on other gear like a better lens or sturdier tripod. I’ll put it this way: a 24 -megapixel camera with a good lens and a steady platform will give you sharper pictures than a 33 megapixel camera with no them, every time.

Which one of these cameras would certainly I recommend? The choice is actually pretty easy. If you’re planning to utilize this camera for advanced or even pro-level sports and creatures photography, I would pick the EOS R7. The higher resolution allows you to put more pixels on a distant subject, while the larger buffer lets you take longer bursts of images before the camera slows down. Other features like dual card slots plus better weather sealing may also be nice to have.

Meanwhile, if you don’t plan to photo those subjects very often – or even if you do, but you’re on a budget and want to put more money toward lenses – go with the EOS R10. It is still extremely capable designed for sports and wildlife, thanks to the high frame rate and essentially the same autofocus system as the EOS R7. The particular R10’s 24 megapixel quality also isn’t too much less than 33 MP anyway, thus landscape and other photographers do not need to worry.

I really hope that helps you choose between the Cannon EOS R10 and EOS R7. Both cameras should be very capable in the right hands, and neither the first is a bad choice even though they’re geared toward different photographers. Let me know below if you have any questions about how the two cameras measure up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.