Nikon Z9 vs Canon EOS R3

The recently-announced Nikon Z9 immediately drew comparisons with Canon’s high-end EOS R3, another mirrorless digital camera geared toward sports and animals photography. While the two digital cameras have plenty of differences, they’re targeted at similar photographers and both cameras bring a lot of features to the table. I’ll compare them below.

Before I begin, I want to note that this is mainly a comparison of specifications. We will add more detailed information to this comparison like dynamic range, high ISO performance, and focusing performance after our copy of the Z9 boats later this year or early 2021.

Specifications Comparison

Camera Function Nikon Z9 Canon EOS R3
Introduced October 2021 September 2021
Camera Type Mirrorless Mirrorless
Sensor Resolution 45. 4 megapixels 24. 0 megapixels
Sensor Type BSI Stacked CMOS BSI Stacked CMOS
Sensor Size 35. 9 × twenty three. 9mm thirty six. 0 × 36. 0mm
Sensor Pixel Size 4. 35µ 6. 0µ
Image Size 8256 × 5504 pixels 6000 × four thousand pixels
High-Res Sensor Shift No No
Focus Putting Shift Yes Yes
Boosted Lower ISO Sensitivity Down to ISO 32 Down to ISO 50
Boosted High ISO Level of sensitivity Up to ISO 102, 400 Up to ISO 204, 800
Image Processor EXPEED 7 DIGIC X
Viewfinder Type Electronic Viewfinder Electronic Viewfinder
Viewfinder Coverage 100% completely
Viewfinder Magnification 0. 8× 0. 76×
Viewfinder Resolution 3. 69 million dots 5. 76 million dots
Viewfinder Refresh Rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Viewfinder Quality Drops When Focusing No No
Built-in Flash No No
Flash Sync Velocity 1/250; high speed sync up to 1/8000 1/250 (electronic front-curtain shutter); 1/200 (mechanical shutter); 1/180 (electronic shutter); high speed sync up to 1/8000
Storage Media 2× CF Express Type B (with XQD compatibility) 1× CF Show Type B; 1× SD UHS-II
Continuous Shooting Speed 20 FPS natural; 30 FPS JPEG; 120 FPS with 11 mp JPEGs thirty FPS raw (electronic shutter with no auto exposure); fifteen FPS raw (electronic shutter only); 12 FPS raw (any shutter, no car exposure); 8 FPS natural (any shutter, no limitations)
Buffer Size (RAW) Over 1000 (high efficiency raw, which Nikon claims has no loss of image quality); 80 frames (lossless compressed raw) 420 (lossy compressed c-raw); 150 (lossless compressed raw)
Max Continuous Shooting Period (RAW) Over 50 seconds 14 seconds
Fastest Shutter Speed 1/32, 000 second 1/64, 000 second
Greatest Shutter Speed 900 seconds 30 seconds
Shutter Kind Electronic shutter only Mechanical, electronic, and EFCS
Shutter Durability Limitless (since there is no mechanical shutter) 500, 000 cycles (mechanical shutter)
Direct exposure Metering Sensor TTL exposure metering making use of main image sensor 384-zone metering
Autofocus System Crossbreed phase/contrast detect AF along with 493 points Dual-pixel CMOS AF along with 1053 zones
Photographer’s-Eye-Sensing AF No Yes
AF Region Mode Individual point AF;   Figure out AF; dynamic AF (S, M, L), wide-area AF (S, L); Auto Area AF; 3D-Tracking Spot AF; 1-point AF; Expand AF area (above, below, left/right, around); Versatile zone AF (three versions); Whole area AF
AF Detection Range (Standardized to f/2 Lens, ISO 100) -5 to 21. 5 EV; -7 to 21. 5 EV with Low-Light AF allowed -6 in order to 21. 5 EV
Video Compression Apple ProRes 422 HQ (10-bit); H. 265 / HEVC (8-bit / 10-bit); H. 264 / AVC (8-bit) H. 265 / HEVC (10-bit); They would. 264 / AVC (8-bit)
Raw Video To be added in 2022 firmware update Yes, 12-bit CRM; along with HDR or C-Log
HDR Video No Yes, HDR PQ gamma
Log Video Yes, inner Yes, internal
Video Maximum Resolution 7680 × 4320 (8K) up to 30 FPS 6144 x 3456 (6K) up to 60 FPS
Slow Motion Movie 4K up to 120 FPS; 1080p as much as 120 FPS 4K up to 120 FRAMES PER SECOND; 1080p up to 120 FPS
LCD Size 3. 2″ diagonal 3. 2″ diagonal
LCD Resolution 2 . 1 million dots 4. 2 million dots
LCD Touchscreen Yes Yes
LCD Tilt Vertical plus horizontal axis Fully articulating
Built-in GPS Yes Yes
Built-in Wi-Fi Yes Yes
Built-in Wired LAN one thousand Base-T Support 1000 Base-T Support
Battery EN-EL18d (backwards compatible with all EN-EL18 type batteries) LP-E19 (backwards compatible with LP-E4N however, not LP-E4)
Battery Life (Energy Saver Off) 700 shots (viewfinder), 740 shots (LCD) 440 shots (viewfinder); 760 pictures (LCD)
Weight (with battery power and card) 1340 g (2. ninety five pounds) 1015 g (2. 24 lbs)
Dimensions (excludes protruding eyepiece) 149 × 149. 5 × ninety. 5 mm (5. 87 × 5. 89 × 3. 56 inches) 150 × a hunread forty two. 6 × 87. two mm (5. 91 × 5. 61 × three or more. 43 inches)
Price in Launch $5500 ( check present price ) $6000 ( check current price )

The biggest difference between these two cameras is certainly resolution, with the Nikon Z9 having a 45-megapixel sensor when compared to Canon EOS R3’s 24 megapixels. A big win on Nikon’s part is that so many of the other specifications – optimum FPS, buffer, and constant shooting time – still manage to remain competitive as well as ahead of the R3. It’s furthermore the less expensive camera simply by $500.

However the EOS R3 certainly isn’t out of the running. While the Nikon Z9 maxes out at 20 FPS when shooting raw, the R3 rises to 30 FPS. The particular R3 also has a feature that will detects where the photographer is definitely looking and places the original focus point at that will location. Both of these features are considerable advantages for sports plus wildlife photography where every millisecond counts.

Something interesting about the Nikon Z9 and EOS R3 is that they are the first 2 full-frame mirrorless cameras in the marketplace with an integrated grip:

Nikon Z9 vs Canon EOS R3

This means each of them are substantially larger and heavier than the majority of mirrorless cameras, but it also provides better battery life, better balance with long lenses, and much more comfortable vertical shooting. Individuals pros and cons are important to note if you’re considering the Sony A1 too, since the A1 doesn’t have an integrated grip (though you can buy one as an add-on).

Even though the form factors are very similar, the EOS R3 really does manage to be about 325 grams / 0. seventy two pounds lighter than the Nikon Z9, which I consider a meaningful difference, especially if you’re handholding the camera for hours at a time. Under the hood, the EOS R3 also has a higher resolution viewfinder with a faster renew rate.

In terms of video, the two cameras are usually trading blows, and the much better one depends on your priorities. It’s nice that the Nikon can shoot 8K video clip if you need extreme resolution (or cropping capabilities), but the EOS R3 is no slouch at 6K. The Canon furthermore shoots raw video and it has HDR video capabilities. Nikon has said that the Z9 may add raw video in the 2022 firmware update, however , so take that into consideration if you don’t mind waiting a couple of months.

Because the two cameras are from various brands, you should also take into account their lens lineups when deciding which one to purchase. At the time I’m publishing this comparison, Canon’s mirrorless lens lineup recieve more telephotos and super-telephotos than Nikon’s, while Nikon recieve more prime lens choices in the wide-to-normal focal lengths. Given that these cameras are mostly meant for sports and animals photography needs, Nikon users at the moment are more likely to need to adjust DSLR glass.


Both these cameras are remarkable technological achievements. That said, they are geared toward different needs, and our recommendations follow from that.

For scenery photography, it isn’t even close. The Nikon Z9 not only has a higher resolution sensor, but also a lower bottom ISO of 64 plus built-in extended shutter speeds up to 900 seconds. It’s a bit heavier, but these features are worth the weight.

For wildlife and sports photography, it’s a level matchup that depends on your priorities. Photographers who do not need maximum resolution for being better-suited for the EOS R3 thanks to its 30 FRAMES PER SECOND shooting and photographer’s-eye-sensing AF activation. On the other hand, the Nikon Z9 is still capable of shooting 30 FPS if you don’t brain JPEG rather than raw (plus up to 120 FPS to get 11-megapixel JPEGs). The Z9 also has a bigger buffer – though the R3’s buffer is obviously no slouch – and, of course , the higher resolution.

One use situation where I might give the Cannon EOS R3 the advantage is normally wedding photography. With the pure volume of photos taken during a wedding, 24 megapixels is often preferable to 45, and it’s still enough for huge prints. The lighter weight of the EOS R3 will be good over the course of the day, and for actually critical moments, having 30 FPS is a bit better than twenty FPS. Still, we’re actually splitting hairs; both of these digital cameras will breeze through a wedding unlike almost anything else available.

Overall, I actually consider the Nikon Z9 to become ahead of the EOS R3, mainly because it manages similar achievements at a higher resolution and slightly lower price. But you will find enough advantages for the Canon EOS R3 that it’s not a slam dunk. If you would like native mirrorless telephoto lens, Canon’s lineup is more considerable at the moment. It may also come down to target performance and high ISO image quality, which are 2 things we’ll test side-by-side once our copy of the Nikon Z9 arrives.

In short, you can’t fail either way. If you’re an existing Cannon or Nikon shooter, I’d stick with the brand you understand and love; if you’re new to the game, take a look at the chart above and figure out which differences are the most meaningful to you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *