Nikon Z9 vs Sony A2

Now that Nikon’s Z9 has launched into the mirrorless planet, the biggest question is just how it stacks up against your competitors. And while it’s a significantly impressive camera, the same can be said about other digital cameras on the market today. Perhaps the biggest competition to the Nikon Z9 could be the Sony A1.

Nikon Z9 vs Sony A1 To Scale
Nikon Z9 versus Sony A1, to scale

How do both of these cameras compare? It’s the back-and-forth battle in many ways, plus it might simply come down to whether you prefer Nikon or even Sony as a system. When I get ahead of personally, let’s take a look at the specifications of the Z9 versus the A2 and how they compare face to face.

Specifications Assessment

Camera Feature Nikon Z9 Sony A1
Announced October 2021 January 2021
Camera Type Mirrorless Mirrorless
Sensor Resolution 45. 4 megapixels 49. 8 megapixels
Sensor Kind Stacked CMOS Stacked CMOS
Sensor Size 35. 9 × twenty three. 9mm thirty-five. 9 × 24mm
Sensor Pixel Size 4. 35µ 4. 16µ
Image Dimension 8256 × 5504 pixels 8640 × 5760 pixels
High-Res Sensor Shift No Yes; up to 200 megapixels
Base ISO ISO 64 ISO 100
Native INTERNATIONALE ORGANISATION FÜR STANDARDISIERUNG Sensitivity ISO 64-25, 600 ISO 100-32, 000
Increased ISO Sensitivity ISO 32-102, 400 ISO 50-102, 400
Image Processor EXPEED 7 BIONZ XR
Viewfinder Type Electronic Viewfinder Electronic Viewfinder
Viewfinder Coverage fully 100%
Viewfinder Magnification 0. 8× 0. 9×
Built-in Flash No No
Flash Sync Acceleration 1/250 (Auto FP high speed sync as much as 1/8000) 1/400 (high speed sync up to 1/8000)
Storage Media 2× CF Show Type B (with XQD compatibility) 2× CF Express Type The (with SD compatibility)
Continuous Shooting Speed twenty FPS raw; 30 FRAMES PER SECOND JPEG; 120 FPS with 11 megapixel JPEGs 30 FPS (lossy compressed raw); 20 FPS (uncompressed and lossless pressurized raw)
Buffer Size (RAW) Over a thousand 155 structures at 30 FPS; 238 frames at 20 FPS
Continuous Shooting Over 50 seconds 5. 2 mere seconds at 30 FPS; 11. 9 seconds at 20 FPS
Shutter Speed Range 1/32, 000 in order to 900 seconds 1/32, 000 to 30 seconds
Shutter Type Electronic shutter only Mechanical plus electronic
Shutter Durability Unlimited (since there is no mechanical shutter) 500, 000 cycles, mechanical shutter
Exposure Metering Sensor TTL exposure metering using main picture sensor 1200-zone evaluative metering
Autofocus Program Hybrid phase/contrast detect AF with 493 points Cross types phase/contrast detect AF with 759 points
AF Area Mode Individual point AF;   Determine AF; dynamic AF (S, M, L), wide-area AF (S, L); Auto Area AF; 3D-Tracking Wide; Zone; Center; Flexible Spot; Expanded Flexible Spot; Tracking
AF Detection Range (f/2 lens, ISO 100) -5 in order to 21. 5 EV; -7 to 21. 5 EV with Low-Light AF enabled -4 to 20 EV
Video Compression Apple ProRes 422 HQ (10-bit); They would. 265 / HEVC (8-bit / 10-bit); H. 264 / AVC (8-bit) 10-bit with four: 2: 2 chroma sampling; XAVC S: MPEG-4 AVC/H. 264, XAVC HS: MPEG-H HEVC/H. 265
Log Movie Yes, internal Yes, inner
Video Maximum Resolution 7680 × 4320 (8K) up to 30p 7680 × 4320 (8K) up to 30p
Gradual Motion Video 4K up to 120p; 1080p up to 120p 4K up to 120p; 1080p up to 240p
Video Maximum Recording Time 125 minutes 30 minutes
LCD Size 3. 2″ diagonal 3″ diagonal
LCD Resolution 2 . 1 million dots 1 . 4 million dots
LCD Touchscreen Yes Yes
LCD Point Vertical plus horizontal axis Vertical axis only
Built-in GPS Yes No
Built-in Wi-Fi Yes Yes
Built-in Wired LAN 1000 Base-T Support 1000 Base-T Assistance
Battery EN-EL18d (backwards compatible with all EN-EL18 type batteries) NP-FZ100
Battery Life 700 shots (viewfinder), 740 shots (LCD) 430 shots (viewfinder), 530 shots (LCD)
Weight (with battery and card) 1340 g (2. 95 pounds) 737 g (1. 62 pounds)
Dimensions (excludes protruding eyepiece) 149 × 149. 5 × 90. 5 mm (5. 87 × 5. 89 × 3. 56 inches) 128. 9 ×  96. 9 × 69. 7 mm (5. 13 × 3. 88 × 2 . 75 inches)
Price at Launch $5500 ( check current price ) $6500 ( check current price )

As you can see, both of these cameras have truly remarkable specifications. They are each capable of shooting rapid bursts of high-resolution images with a minimum of hundreds of shots before the buffer fills. Our only warning against obtaining either of these cameras is that you’ll no longer have an reason: If your photos don’t end up well, it’s not because of the digital camera.

Between the two, the better choice isn’t immediately obvious. Sony has advantages in maximum frame price (30 FPS raw instead of 20), high resolution sensor shift, and much smaller size/weight. Nikon has a bigger buffer, a lower base ISO, and a dual-axis tilting rear LCD. It is also less expensive by $1000.

Even exact same price, I’d say your decision – if you’re completely ambig about the brands – comes down to this: Do you want a big camera or a small camera?

The Sony A2 has a traditional mirrorless style, weighing 500 grams (1. 1 pounds) less than the particular Nikon Z9 and taking up less than half the volume. In turn, they have a more cramped button layout, shorter battery life, and even worse heat dissipation (as proven with the 30 minute compared to 125 minute recording limit). By comparison, the Nikon Z9 is a hulking camera larger than most DSLRs, but the design with the integrated vertical grip is one that sports plus wildlife professionals have gravitated toward for a reason.

The price difference obviously favors Nikon, but even then, I know plenty of photographers who would rule out a three or more. 0 lb mirrorless camera (or a 3. 0 lb camera of  any type) and it doesn’t matter that it’s less expensive than the Sony. So , start your decision with all the camera size and bodyweight in mind. Only after that should you start comparing the other popular features of the cameras.

For landscape photography and especially backcountry hiking, the Sony A1 is probably the way to go. In general, its sensor-shift mode and light weight are going to make a larger difference than the Nikon Z9’s base ISO of sixty four and dual-axis tilting FLAT SCREEN. The one issue is with extended shutter speeds (since Nikon goes up to 900 seconds), meaning that you’ll want to remember to bring along a remote release when shooting with the Sony after dark.

For sports activities and wildlife photography, I’d go with the Nikon Z9 even though the Sony has 30 FPS raw shooting instead of 20. First off, 20 FPS is more than enough meant for 99% of needs. Keep in mind, 24 frames per second is  video . The Z9’s nearly unlimited buffer (and, according to Nikon, truly limitless shutter life) are bigger factors.   On top of that, the particular Z9’s form factor and switch layout are optimized designed for sports shooting, whereas you will probably want to spend more cash to get the battery grip for your A1 if that’s your own genre of photography.

Videographers should be happy either way. The two cameras both offer log video documenting, 8K, 4K 120p, and 10-bit recording with 4: 2: 2 sampling. The largest differences are that the Sony A1 shoots 240 FRAMES PER SECOND at 1080p (rather compared to 120 FPS), while the Nikon Z9 has a longer optimum recording time of 125 moments and is capable of ProRes 422 HQ. Eventually, Nikon reports they’ll release a firmware update with 12-bit raw video recorded internally (including ProRes raw if shooting 4K), which may push it off the ledge.

Nikon Z9 for Video

In terms of broader considerations, Sony has the larger zoom lens lineup at the moment, including a 400mm f/2. 8 and 600mm f/4 that are presently shipping. Nikon has been filling out its lens lineup over time but is still missing some of the crucial optics (though the development of a 400mm f/2. 8 has at least been announced ). Nikon also has plenty of F-mount gear available from years of making SLR and DIGITAL SLR lenses, and supertelephotos a few of the lenses that work ideal on Nikon Z cameras with the FTZ adapter. Therefore , if nothing else sways a person, it may simply come down that system you’d rather use.

Overall, both of these cameras are amazing and at the particular peak of what a modern mirrorless camera can do, at least if the specifications tell most of the story (we’re still waiting to get our hands on the particular Nikon for real-world testing). Rather than saying, “You can’t go wrong either way, ” I’ll say this instead: “You  will go right either way. ”

Take a long look into the specifications above, and do not forget the form factors of the 2 cameras. Then, once you have filled your wall with charts and strings like in a detective movie, please flip a coin: )

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *